#86 Lu. 10:25-37 HOW TO INHERIT ETERNAL LIFE Introduction: In our text today a man comes to Jesus with a question about eternal life. It is question that is of great importance to each one of us here today. It is important to those who know that they not saved and are on the road to hell. It is important to them because they need to know the right way to get saved. It is important to those of us who claim to be saved because we need to know if we have tried in the right way to get saved. I. The man who asked the question V. 25, "And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?" Luke tells us several things about this man. He tells us first that this man is a lawyer. The word, lawyer, in Scripture does not carry quite the same meaning as it caries today. It means one who is an expert in dealing with questions about the Law of Moses. He may be a scribe whose daily occupation was to copy the scriptures by hand. Thus he would become an expert in what the law of Moses said and he would be looked upon as an expert in what the law of Moses means. Now if the Ten Commandments were the only commandments in the law of Moses, almost anyone could become an expert, but the ten commandments is only a small beginning. There are several hundred commandments in the law of Moses. Because the lawyers became skilled in their knowledge of the law of Moses they were often used as public speakers to explain what the law is all about. Also, since the many laws which Moses gave involved civil affairs lawyers were often used to argue civil cases before the court. But the lawyer, himself, was more of a religious leader than a court lawyer. This is the kind of man who came to Jesus with a question. He was a leader, a religious leader, an expert, an authority on the Law of Moses. Luke tells us also that this man came with a loaded question. He was not trying to learn from Jesus. He was tempting Jesus. He was trying to trap Jesus. He was asking a question which related to the Law of Moses hoping he would be able to use the answer of Jesus against Him. He was hoping that Jesus would say something contrary to the Law of Moses. He was hoping that at least Jesus would say something that, in his own expertise in the law, he could twist and make it to appear to be against the Law of Moses. This man was no humble inquirer who wanted to be saved. He was a bitter enemy of Jesus who was attempting to bring about the death of Jesus. The question itself was a perfectly legitimate question. It is a vital question that we all need to know the answer to. That is what made his approach to Jesus so deadly. He was appeared as a friend, but he was a vicious enemy out after the blood of Jesus Christ. II. The question that Jesus asked the lawyer in return V. 26, "He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?" This is another way of asking, "What does the Scripture say about the matter?" If you want to know what the Scriptural answer is to a question you have to go to the Scriptures to find out what the Scriptures say. Then whatever the Scriptures say, that is the answer to your question. So Jesus asked him, "What do the Scriptures say? What is written in the law? What is written in Scriptures?" V. 27, "And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself." Surprisingly the man gave the very best possible answer. Instead of quoting from the numerous commands of the law, he quoted from the two Scriptures which give the basis for the whole law. He quoted from Deuteronomy 6:5. This verse commands one to love the Lord his God with all his heart, with all his soul and with all his might. He also quoted from Leviticus 19:18 which commands that one should love his neighbor as himself. These are the very Scriptures that Jesus Himself would later use to answer another lawyer who also comes with a trick question. What this lawyer did not understand is that it is impossible to keep these laws 100% in our depraved sinful nature. The law was never given as a means of salvation. It was given to show us that we are sinners in the sight of God so that we will then repent of our sin and trust God for mercy and for salvation. It is only after one has repented and trusted the Lord for His mercy and is thus born again that he can begin to have the love of God that he should have. It is after he has repented and is saved that he can begin to have the love for his neighbor that he should have. Even then---even after he is saved--- he cannot in the flesh love God 100% nor can he love his neighbor as much as he loves himself. It is only in the inward spirit nature that has been born again that he can do so. But the lawyer did give the right Scriptural answer to the question Jesus asked and so Jesus tells him so. Jesus had asked, "What does the law have to say on the matter?" and the man gave the right answer. V. 28, "And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live." Now we might wonder, "Why would Jesus tell this man to do this and he would live?" That is, Jesus said, "Do as these two commandments say and you will have the kind of life that you are seeking. You will have everlasting life." Why would Jesus tell him such a thing? Does not the Apostle Paul write in Galatians 3:11 that no man is justified by the law? Does not Paul say in Ephesians 2:9 that salvation is not of works? Does he not say in Titus 3:5 that salvation is not by works of righteousness which man can do? He does. Then why would Jesus tell this man that if he would keep these laws he would have everlasting life? You are right. Salvation is not by works of righteousness on the part of man. No man---absolutely no man is justified in the sight of God by keeping the law. That is just the point that Jesus was trying to make to this man. Jesus was trying to show this man that he had not and could not keep the law. In Matthew 22:35-40 Jesus said that all of the law hangs on these two commandments. If a man keeps these two commandments 100% then he would also keep whole the law 100% and no man keeps the law 100%. He that breaks the law in the least way is guilty of breaking the whole law. If you break one link of a chain that chain is broken. If you break a dish in any given spot that dish is broken. You do not have to be as wicked and mean as you could possibly be to break the law of God. If you break the law in any way whatsoever you have broken that law. Now this man, this lawyer had not kept either of these laws 100%. He most certainly had not kept the first one. He would not be there asking trick questions of the Son of God. If he loved God at all he would not be out after the blood of Jesus Christ the Son of God. For some reason or other this man never responded to Jesus regarding this commandment. He did respond regarding the command to love his neighbor as himself. Now keep in mind that he is the one who quoted this Scripture to Jesus and thereby acknowledged that this command is right. But merely knowing the command does not make one right with God. Neither does acknowledging that this command is good make one right with God. Likewise, neither does trying to obey this command make one right with God. One would have to keep this command 100%. In fact he would have to keep both these commandments 100% in order to right with God by his own works of righteousness. III. Another question by the lawyer and the Lord's answer That is were the rub comes. That is what hit a raw nerve with this lawyer. He knew that he had not kept this second command. He knew that he had not loved his neighbor as much as he loved himself. V. 29, "But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?" He knew that he had not kept this law but he wanted to appear to others that he had kept it. Therefore he tried to justify himself in the eyes of those present by asking a question which dodged the issue. He asked, "Who is my neighbor?" Jesus then told that man a story about a man on the Jericho road. This story would give him the answer to his question about eternal life and should convince him that he had not kept the law of Moses. Listen. V. 30-35, "And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee." The story was about a man, a Jew, a fellow Jew with whom this lawyer could relate. This man, this fellow Jew, started to Jericho from Jerusalem. The highway led through a rough rugged rocky country which made it easy for robbers to ambush their unsuspecting victims. This man, this Jew was attacked, beaten and robbed. He was left at the point of death and without help very soon would die. Jesus said that while this man lay on the ground wounded and dying a priest came along. He could not help but see this helpless man lying there on the ground. It appeared to the man that help had arrived. But this priest crossed over to the other side of the road and went around him and went on his way down the road. That priest did not attempt to help that man. Then along came a Levite. The Levites were helpers to the priests in the temple at Jerusalem. Surely this Levite will help this man. But he didn't. He, too, just passed right on by and left that man to die. But finally, there came along a Samaritan. The Jews hated the Samaritans and, to be fair, I might add, the Samaritans usually hated the Jews. But this Samaritan saw this wounded man lying there in the road and he totally ignored the fact that he was a Jew. He dressed this man's wounds and carried him to an inn that was on this road. He left money with the innkeeper to cover the man's expenses and said, "If that is not enough I will pay you the rest the next time I come along." IV. A final question from Jesus Jesus then asked that lawyer a very important question. V. 36, "Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?" The lawyer once again gave a right answer. V. 37, "And he said, He that showed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise." Now listen. There are many valuable lessons that we can see in this story, but for the moment let us not get so busy looking for those lessons that we miss the point that Jesus was making to this lawyer. Let me put it into my own words. Jesus was saying to this man, "If you are going to be accepted in the eyes of God by the Law of Moses then you have got to be 100% perfect. You have got to love the Lord your God with ALL your heart, with ALL your soul, and with ALL your strength. That is 100%. Then this means you have got to love your fellow man with as much as you love yourself. This lawyer knew that he had not loved that much. In his mind's eye he could identify with the priest and the Levite who passed the wounded man by because he knew that this is what he would have done. He would have been too afraid to tarry long enough to help the wounded man for fear of being attacked also. He would look out for number one and go right on by. The truth of the matter is that he could not love that wounded man as much as he loved himself. If this lawyer would just be honest with himself and honest with God he would have to admit that he had not loved his fellow man as much as he loved himself. Neither could he love them that much. Let me put it this way. If this lawyer would just be honest with himself and with God he would have to admit that he could not be saved by keeping the Law of Moses. He could not be saved by his own works of righteousness. He could not get to heaven by his own goodness. He could not get to heaven by his works. In other words, if he was going to get to heaven at all, he was going to have to cast himself on the mercy of God and ask God to forgive him of his sin. He was going to have to trust in the Christ, the Redeemer, whom God had promised to send. If he were going to get to heaven it would be entirely by the totally undeserved grace and mercy of God through the Christ. V. The point concerning the salvation of your soul Now listen again. You will be honest with me, won't you? You will be honest with yourself and with God, won't you? Won't you admit that you have not kept the Law of God 100%? Won't you admit that you have not really loved God with all your heart, soul and strength? Won't you admit that you have failed to keep this commandment by a mile? And won't you admit that you have also failed to love your fellow man as much as you love yourself? I strongly suspect that you could name a few that you have outright despised. Haven't you? The point is that no man, absolutely not man, is justified in the sight of God by the keeping of the law. No man is saved by his own works of righteousness. If you are going to get to heaven you are going to have to turn to God for forgiveness of your sins. You are going to have to trust in Jesus Christ as your Savior. If you are going to stay out of hell you are going to have to call on Jesus and ask Him to be merciful to you and save your soul. Conclusion: How about it? Are you ready?